Box art for A Royal Affair

A Royal Affair

  • Rated R

independent, special interest

The true story of an ordinary man who wins a queens heart and starts a revolution.

Rotten Tomatoes® scores

  • Critic Score
  • Audience Score

common sense

ON for kids age 16
0 out of 5
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
3 out of 5
1 out of 5
Positive messages
2 out of 5
Positive role models
2 out of 5
4 out of 5
3 out of 5

Hefty historical drama has some racy, violent moments.

what parents need to know

Parents need to know that A Royal Affair -- an engrossing, epic Danish drama based on true historical events -- is filled with the sort of intrigue and dalliances that pepper most accounts of monarchies. Women and men bed partners they're not married to; women are berated and ostracized for actions that men aren't; power corrupts. Expect some drinking and laudanum use, love scenes that show heaving cleavage and naked backsides, and minimal swearing (in subtitles).

what families can talk about

  • Families can talk about how A Royal Affair portrays women's options during the time it takes place. Why do you think the queen stayed with the king?
  • Talk about the Age of Enlightenment and how its influence is depicted here. Are the rights and freedoms that its supporters fought for still relevant in this day and age?
  • How is this movie similar to, or different from, other Hollywood depictions of the ruling class and the monarchy?
  • How closely do you think A Royal Affair adheres to history? How many liberties with the facts do you think a movie like this can take? Why might filmmakers decide to do that?

movie reviews from Rotten Tomatoes®

  • Tomatometer®

    reviews counted: 21
    see all A Royal Affair reviews
  • Audience


Top Critic Reviews

Fresh: Even appreciated simply as a little-known chapter of European history, it proves consistently engrossing, edifying and affecting.

- Ann Hornaday, Washington Post, Friday, November 16, 2012

Fresh: Director Nikolaj Arcel gets outstanding performances from all three of the principals, which enlivens the whole affair considerably.

- Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic, Thursday, November 15, 2012

Fresh: A Royal Affair covers plenty of stately ground, all in good time.

- Claudia Puig, USA Today, Thursday, November 29, 2012

Audience Reviews

4 stars

What could have been a sentimental and pompous period drama, turns out to be an engaging character study, which seamlessly merges politics, social commentary, and romance in a rich tapestry of gorgeous design. Vikander is a young English flower plucked away to marry the King of Denmark. That would be all fine and dandy if not for the fact that the King isn't all there. At times he acts childish and shy, and others he is a loud and obnoxious creep. Boe gives an exhilarating performance, never forgetting to keep an essence of sympathy, even when bragging about sex with prostitutes and allowing his jealousy to confine his new queen. Into this, not quite so happy union steps Mikkelsen. A surgeon appointed as a spy to some anti-royals, who eventually falls for the queen. It's like a romantic period The Departed. A friendship, of some sorts, does grow between Mikkelsen and Boe, which adds to the tragedy of betrayal. Incredible costumes and sets transport us to the time, and the performances and writing keep a well paced drama strictly on course. Great stuff.

- kiriyamakazou, Sunday, February 24, 2013

4 stars

Period dramas, as many of us know, can be a double-edged sword. Although rarely bad, they tend, on occasion, to get lost in their own sense of importance; advocating costume work and talky politics, as opposed to telling a good story. A Royal Affair holds no such shortcomings. In truth, it is the most profoundly moving history piece I've seen in many years. Comparable to grand epics like Braveheart and Amadeus, which, I should emphasize, is not a parallel I draw lightly. Every quivering lip, every lustful gaze. Not a moment rings false in Nikolaj Arcel's harrowing account of a love story so powerful, that it would change the fate of an entire nation. Set in the latter half of the 18th century, it stars Swedish actress Alicia Vikander as Caroline Mathilde, who becomes queen of Denmark, as she moves away from her royal residence in England to marry King Christian VII. But whatever optimism she had for an agreeable life with him, soon dies away as Christians turns out to be an emotionally unstable man-child, with a psychologically unsound Peter Pan syndrome. Not unlike Mozart, only decadent, selfish and with little care for his newly arrived queen. All the while, the cultural movement that would later be known as The Age of Enlightenment is quickly spreading through Europe, now knocking at the door of Denmark as well. However, where Caroline admires the philosophies of free-thinking reformists like Rousseau and Voltaire, the Danish court stands firmly against it, banning all literature associated with those ideas. Sunk in melancholy, with her husband the king growing ever more insane, she accepts the only purpose she has left, as in giving birth to a future regent. But then, just as hope seems lost, everything changes. A German intellectual, Johann Friedrich Struensee, is employed by King Christian as his personal physician. Played to the hilt by an outstanding Mads Mikkelsen, Johann and Queen Caroline find an instant attraction to each other, which flourishes into a full-out love affair, as dangerous as it is passionate. I've seen quite a few period films in my days, but none have left me so stirred as this lavishly crafted masterstroke of a film. Lacing groundbreaking historic events with the forbidden desires of the two kindred spirits, it creates intrigues of such potency that you invest yourself completely. Having lived in Denmark in my younger years, where I also met my first love, made the experience all the more close to home. Filled with warmth, humor, elegance and splendor, A Royal Affair was even more fantastic than I had hoped. The way Johann's and Caroline's affections for each other brought freedom to an entire country is inspiring beyond words. Their sacrifices also remind us how the liberties we enjoy today ought not to be taken for granted. There were, after all, those who paid for it dearly in blood, sweat and tears. Tears are what I came to shed as well, as an effect of its devastating character fates. I won't go into any exact details here, in order to avoid spoilers, but those who have seen it or know their history, will understand what I'm referring to. A majestic, audacious and beautifully acted drama, which bares itself like few other films, with a transcendent depiction of one of history's greatest love stories. Truly a must-see, if only to be swept away by the vulnerable, heart-rending performances of its two leading stars.

- CloudStrife84, Sunday, November 11, 2012

4 stars

It's a Danish soap opera, or rather, just a Danish royal period drama, because it does seem like Danish royalty was always somewhere on the promiscuous side during the time in which this film takes place. Shoot, it was so bad that during the 1600s, before all of this stuff was even going on, Shakespeare was writing a play about adultery, incest and all of that good stuff in the Danish monarchy, or at least I guess that's what they were talking about in "Hamlet", because as much as I like that story, Shakespeare sure knew how to convolute things, so I guess that means that he's perfect to write about something like relationships within the Danish monarchy, which were more convoluted than "Inception" (Ha-ha, "Incestion"; no, there's no incest in this film). Okay, jokes aside, maybe the Danish weren't too soap operish with their relationships, or at least no more so than any other nation that was led by a monarch who sure knew how to use his or her power, but do rest assured folks that this film does indeed deliver on affairs of the royal persuasion. Speaking of which, I just cannot help but feel as though this film's title is unimaginative, but hey, I don't know what else they could call this historical drama about an "affair" than involves "a royal" person, and it's not like they were going to keep the same title from the 1935 film that also dealt with the events portrayed in this film, because they're gunning for the Oscars, and I don't think that they would have as good a chance of getting there if they held the flaunted the title "The Dictator". Actually, maybe they should have kept that title and had critics mistake this film for Sacha Baron Cohen's latest opus, because as much as Cohen has been randomly working his way into recent serious dramatic pieces set in Europe, this film probably would have actually been taken more seriously as Oscar bait. Eh, it'll do just fine, because it is indeed with some juicy subject matter, and is, on top of all of that, actually pretty darn good. Still, it's not like this film is entirely as juicy as its subject matter, having quite a bit of kick, though not without spots that are flatter than others, and for a number of reasons. While not exactly deserving to be sprawling, this film's intriguing and ultimately generally well-handled story is conceptually meaty enough to warrant something of a hefty length, and at just over two hours and a quarter, this film appears to boast a comfortable runtime, but ultimately achieves its length through a few problematic means, particularly pacing unevenness, which leaves certain aspects to feel glossed over and hurried, if explored at all, and quite a few other aspects to drag out, or at least feel like they're dragging out, thanks to atmospheric slow spells. I wasn't exactly going into this film expecting a bore, but the final product is livelier than I feared it would be, and yet, with that said, Nikolaj Arcel can go only so far with liveliness as a storyteller before slipping up, thus leaving more than a few bits of this film to quiet down a bit too much and bland up quite a bit, very rarely to a dull point, but consistently to a disengaging point. These particular extremes in the film's sloppy pacing range distance emotional resonance a smidge, but not as much as they distance quite a bit of fluidity to pacing, until what you end up with is a paceless opus that may make most every one of its beats compelling enough to sustain your investment thoroughly, but still finds time to meander along as it treads its 137-minute course with limited pacing. Plot structuring problems really aren't as severe as I make them sound, but they are common and undeniable, though not the only problems within Nikolaj Arcel's and Rasmus Heisterberg's script, whose characterization is handled well enough directorially to genuinely hit, but sometimes feels a touch tainted by subtlety issues that aren't too considerable, but betray a bit of genuineness, particularly in the drama department, which will occasionally slip into ever so unfortunate histrionics. The genuineness in this film's directorial execution is enough to dilute the stings of subtlety issues, but the point is that the film isn't quite as consistently comfortable with its dramatic aspects as it probably should be, thus full dramatic impact suffers, then takes some additional beatings from the film's simply being, if nothing else, a rather conventional historical drama, complete with formula tropes that leave the film to, after a while, take on some sense of predictability. It's not too hard to see where this film is going, and while the journey that this film takes to a foreseeable point is engrossing enough for your investment to never go distanced too far, trouble with plot originality and structure, as well as atmospheric pacing, can be found more than a few times throughout this film, thus making for a rewarding final product that still could have been a bit better. Still, do note that I did, in fact, just deem this film rewarding, because even though this film isn't quite all that upstanding, or even all that refreshing, it is strong, with plenty of engagement value and, of course, artistic value. Though not entirely breathtaking, Rasmus Videbk's cinematography for this film is nothing short of excellent, with striking detail and distinct lighting, which will often play with coloring to give the film's visual style a kind of fitting warmth that attracts consistently, especially when we reach relatively rare, but worthwhile occasions in which magic falls into the path of Videbk's photographic eye and delivers on a truly stunning shot or two. Photographically, the film accels and finds its visual style firmly reinforced, while setting goes brought to life by Niels Sejer's production designs and Manon Rasmussen's costume designs, which are essentially exceptional in their reviving 18th century Denmark with a kind of broad intricacy that captures and sells you on the scope of this film's environment and era, but not at the expense of some restraint that secures you down to earth and gives you a kind of intimate acquaintance within the world that this film's upstanding production value brings to life without getting to the point of style over substance. A lot of care clearly went into this film's technical value, and the results are fruitful, delivering on upstanding production value and striking photographic tastes that breathe much life into both style and substance, though perhaps the former most of all, as substance stands pretty strong on its own. There's not too much that's all that unique within this film's fact-based subject matter, or at least not in the execution that further dilutes substance impact through pacing and subtlety issues, so we're not quite looking at the makings of a great film, or even an all that excellent film, but you'd be hard pressed to not be intrigued by this film's, as the Rotten Tomatoes consensus put it, "juicy story", whose historical, dramatic, thematic and character depths could have hit harder in the long run, but hit hard enough in concept to, as the great Leonardo DiCaprio would probably put it, claim your curiosity, while Nikolaj Arcel, as director, truly claims your attention. Arcel does only so much to compensate for the hiccups in his and Rasmus Heisterberg's screenplay, but compensation is here, and can be found throughout the film, gracing the atmosphere with a kind of inspired intrigue that doesn't always deliver on the fun factor, but certainly draws some range out of this film's layered story, especially when the more effective dramatic points come into play and deliver on some pretty effective emotional resonance. It's this film's ending that may deliver on the sharpest emotional punctuation, but most every part of the film goes saved as strong by the inspiration within Arcel's efforts, and goes carried by the inspiration within this film's lead performers, some of whom are a bit of material consistency punch-up away from being all-out remarkable, with Mads Mikkelsen portraying Johann Friedrich Struensee's descent from smooth respectability to a man threatened by his own love with layers and emotional range that are just as present in our younger, less experienced talents, from Mikkel Flsgaard - whose charming, when not either sympathetic or even kind of scary portrayal of the spoiled king is more convincing than the writing of Christian VII - to the lovely Alicia Vikander, whose often atmospheric portrayal of a woman who is being driven deeper and deeper into entrapment by unhappy relationships is particularly enthralling. Whether they be veterans or newcomers, most everyone in this film engages, with the leads really commanding your attention, which shouldn't drift away too often, because with all of its lapses in full effectiveness, this film feels inspired enough to reward as a strong drama. To conclude this affair, when pacing isn't uneven, it's simply too slow for its own good, thus emotional resonance goes distanced a bit, and further driven back by subtlety issues and conventionalism that help in making this film a predictable one that falls short of what it could have been, but still accels as strong, with a striking visual style and remarkable production value that compliment the selling of this film's compelling subject matter, which is truly brought to life by Nikolaj Arcel's inspired direction, and carried by our lead cast members' inspired performances, thus making "A Royal Affair" a generally compelling historical drama that has its shortcomings, but nevertheless perseveres as rewarding. 3/5 - Good

- crossbladezero, Saturday, February 16, 2013