Box art for At Any Price

At Any Price


In the competitive world of modern agriculture, ambitious Henry Whipple (Dennis Quaid) wants his rebellious son Dean (Zac Efron) to help expand his family's farming empire.

Rotten Tomatoes® scores

  • Critic Score
  • Audience Score

common sense

PAUSE for kids age 16
2 out of 5
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
2 out of 5
4 out of 5
Positive messages
1 out of 5
Positive role models
0 out of 5
3 out of 5
5 out of 5

Indie drama's messages undercut by weak story, racy content.

what parents need to know

Parents need to know that At Any Price -- an indie drama about a family of corn farmers in Illinois -- raises some serious social, political, and economic issues but loses traction due to a weak story and characters who aren't exactly admirable. Sexual content is a big issue, as the two main characters -- a father and son -- have sex with the same woman (the father is cheating on his wife with her, and the son is cheating on his girlfriend with her). The sex scenes don't actually have any nudity, but a graphic porn magazine is shown for a few seconds in another scene. Language is fairly strong, with several uses of "f--k" and "s--t," as well as other words. There are a couple of violent fights, one of which results in a death by hammer blow. A gun is fired, but only at a store window. All the main characters drink alcohol from time to time, with no lasting effects.

what families can talk about

  • Families can talk about the farming-related issues that At Any Price raises. According to the movie, what's better about modern farming, and what's worse? Can/should it be changed?
  • How do you feel about Henry and Dean after they sleep with the same woman? Why?
  • What's your impression of the characters at the end of the movie? What lessons have they learned? What lessons have they not learned? Are any of them role models?

movie reviews from Rotten Tomatoes®

  • Tomatometer®

    reviews counted: 20
    see all At Any Price reviews
  • Audience


Top Critic Reviews

Rotten: Feels like a series of note cards ("father-son conflict," "dad's mistress hits on son") that never weave together to make a gripping plot.

- Alonso Duralde, TheWrap, Friday, April 26, 2013

Rotten: It may be saying some true things about the new world of cutthroat agriculture, but it says them in a singularly unconvincing way.

- Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Thursday, May 9, 2013

Rotten: Easy resolutions compete with preposterous melodrama.

- Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News, Thursday, April 25, 2013

Audience Reviews

2 stars

A silly little melodrama that would have been a lot better if it focused its narrative on the big business of farming and GMOs instead of the inevitable family conflict and murder. It doesn't help that the leads are a boring Zac Efron and a unbearably hammy Dennis Quaid.

- fb20312798, Wednesday, August 28, 2013

3 stars

Man, Clancy Brown probably took this film at any price, because he hasn't been doing anything lately, or at least I don't think he has been, because the poor sucker has been trapped in the world of voice actors, so we never see his odd mug. Well, he could be doing worse, like Dennis Quaid, who might not be doing too bad when you look at his recent hit-miss ratio, but his career is going to need some work after a certain recent decision. Someone probably should have offered Quaid any price to not be in "Movie 43", and the disaster only cost about $6 million, even with its frustratingly star-heavy cast, so Quaid clearly isn't one to ask for all that much money. Oh yeah, Quaid joined "Movie 43" for cheap, and that makes his being attached to the project even more hard to forgive, but hey, I'd imagine he's on the right path to earning back respect with this film, which must be good, seeing as how it also features Zac Efron and Heather Graham, two people who make plenty of good decisions when it comes to films, like Dennis Quaid. Seriously though, I can joke all day about how Zac Efron was miscast, as he is just too pretty to handle the hardcore world of professional car racing, but Efron as Quaid's son is perfect, so Rotten Tomatoes' consensus has it right when it says that Ramin Bahrani has a really good eye for detail. Shoot, last thing that the guy did was a short film about a plastic bag that went on a revelatory journey with slightly philosophical and environmentalist thematic depth and the voice of Werner Herzog, so he at least has a great eye for detail when it comes to arthouse clichs. Don't worry people, this film isn't quite that avant-garde, and yet, as much as I liked it, it still has some questionable areas. I joke about the compliments to Ramin Bahrani's attention to detail as a storyteller, but there is a certain thoughtfulness to this narrative that thins out rises and falls in plotting for the sake of delicately soaking up depth, and such a meditativeness in storytelling is often pretty effective in reinforcing what compellingness there is to this thin drama, but it leaves the film to limp a bit too much to its point, with only so much kick in atmospheric dynamicity to keep intrigue alive. There's enough entertainment value to this film for its steadiness to ever get dull, but the final product is consistently bland, to some extent, and as if that's not problematic enough, the much of what the film is so meditative on is a bit too familiar. Hardly anything is new about this film that ends up being driven by its formulaic conflicts and character types, and you can't help but notice that, not just because the film is, like I said, a bit too meditative upon its familiar narrative, but because the film has a tendency to take on histrionic tropes. I wouldn't say that the film is quite as melodramatic as certain other critics say, but make no mistake, on top of being formulaic, this film's story is plagued with questionable storytelling touches and, in some areas, moderately thin characters which dilute the genuineness of this pretty human drama. The film goes bloated with too much steadiness, too many familiar beats and too much overblown drama, and gradually loses steam that was so limited to begin with that the film rarely, if ever appears to stand much of a chance of escaping underwhelmingness, no matter how much Ramin Bahrani clearly wants this film to do better than it ultimately does. Bahrani's ambition often ignites an inspiration that in turn ignites a relative high point in storytelling, but most of what Bahrani is celebrating is questionable material, and that's a shame, because this film could have perhaps been more, yet is ultimately rendered too weak by its draggy, familiar, histrionic and overambitious storytelling to escape underwhelmingness. Nonetheless, the final product keeps you going as much as it can, at least from a visual standpoint, as it has some pretty settings, and a visual style that knows how to play up such pretty environments. Alright, there's really not all that much that's especially special about Michael Simmonds' cinematography, but it is handsome, or at least knows how to capture handsome visuals, taking tasteful advantage of crisp definition and a tight scope to immerse you in the distinct and often lovely Iowa locations with a celebratory appreciation for the environment that ends up playing a hefty role in this drama. ...Okay, so, yeah, I'm making a bit of a stretch when I praise this film's locations, but there is something quite attractively simplistic about this Iowa environment, and that does more than you'd think in coloring up the film's enjoyability, though, as you can imagine, this film can't possibly run all that far on the backs of a good-looking presentation of good-looking settings. This film's story is something of a mess, or at least the telling of this story is, but there's still plenty of depth here, as the story boasts thematic depth that, while typically about as formulaic as most of the other aspects of storytelling, is noble, and often finds itself brought to life by undeniable highlights in direction, because even though the thoughtfulness in Ramin Bahrani's storytelling all too often does little more than thin out rises and falls in narrative structure, there are those moments in which Bahrani soaks up enough of the film's depth to create moving moments, some of which give you effective glimpses into what could have been. Granted, this film was likely never to be too much, as its subject matter is so messy, even in concept, and in execution, it's even messier, but not so messy that Bahrani can't to an adequate job of selling often thin drawn characters, who are, of course, sold more effectively by this film's pretty decent cast. Now, the cast isn't exactly filled with outstanding talents, and even if it was, there's not a whole lot of acting material to work with, yet most everyone has an opportunity to earn your investment, with Dennis Quaid being a relative standout with his convincing portrayal of a questionably drawn character with a couple subtle layers that Quaid sells about as well as he can. Some of the strengths that I just cited are a little bit stronger than a make them sound, and others are about as simply decent as I make them sound, but either way, the point is that there's not a whole lot of strengths to this film, yet there is charm, and plenty of it, so much so that the final product ends up being, not simply endearing, but pretty entertaining. I sure do wish that this film was more than simply entertaining, but the heart to this film is hard to deny, and when such ambition is done justice by highlights in direction and acting, you end up with a final product that endears as decent, if underwhelming. When the price is paid, all you end up with is a draggy, formulaic, melodramatic and, of course, overly hopeful drama that ultimately collapses into underwhelmingness, but not so deeply that the attractive setting, - tastefully celebrated by Michael Simmonds' crisp photography - relative high points in directorial effectiveness, and inspiration in the performances don't do enough justice to charming ambition to make Ramin Bahrani's "At Any Price" an endearing little drama, though not exactly one to remember all that much. 2.5/5 - Fair

- crossbladezero, Sunday, August 4, 2013

2 stars

A modern day Shakespearean-lite tragedy/morality tale of an Iowa farm family set in the highly-competitive world of agribusiness. Henry Whipple (Dennis Quaid - In Good Company) is a moderately successful GMO pusher/salesman in southwestern Iowa who has high hopes that his golden child will take over his farm and business. When that said child up and leaves to climb mountains in South America, Henry has to pin his hopes on his rebellious, race-car driving son Dean (Zac Efron - The Paperboy), instead. Dean is highly aware that he isn't his father's first choice and his restless angst proves rather troublesome for the entire family. His worried but supportive mother (Kim Dickens - "Deadwood") does what she can to keep the family glued together even though she is (also) aware -- there is a lot of awareness in this film -- that Henry has a mistress (Heather Graham - Boogie Nights). When some of Henry's business practices come into question, their entire "empire" is put in jeopardy and some will try to keep it "at any price". The film starts rather slow but eventually won over my interest but it does take on a few-too-many tangents that make the story too encompassing -- there end up being too many storylines that might or might not go anywhere. While I appreciate the way this film ended -- it is a morality play -- the inclusion of so many of these side-stories (that ultimately mean nothing) is frustrating as a lot of the film ends up being a waste of time. The film is watchable and respectable but not much else.

- ThomasJayWilliams, Wednesday, July 17, 2013